Court granted liberty to petitioners to approach District Consumer Forum and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach District Consumer Forum under Section 25 CPC Act 1986.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.297 of 2015
ORDER: (Per RR,J)
Smt. B.Kavita Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the District Consumer Forum under Section 25 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
_____________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
19th January, 2015 GHN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Kavita Yadav
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
