Writ petition not pressed on merits. Court dismissed the petition, leaving the petitioner liberty to file a tax appeal.
Petitioner allowed liberty to file appeal against the impugned tax demand.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 2950 OF 2007
13-11-2015
Between:
S.G. Thippeswamy
… Petitioner
And
The Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur, Anantapur District and another
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 2950 OF 2007
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition on merits and seeks liberty to the petitioner to file appeal against the impugned demand of tax.
Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. It is open to the petitioner to file an appeal against the demand notice, if he so desires and advised. If any such appeal is filed, the concerned authority shall deal with the same in accordance with law.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
12-11-2015
ks
S.G. Thippeswamy
The Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
