3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of the earlier decision reducing the term, the petitioner’s tenure was terminated. Aggrieved thereby, petitioner instituted W.P.No.7333 of 2015 wherein this Court granted interim order on 20.03.2015. The same was also not implemented compelling him to file contempt case. Only thereafter, it was implemented. In the process, there was a break of 8 months 20 days. Petitioner’s term of appointment is two years and therefore he is entitled to complete two years. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that because of the fault of the respondent authorities only, this break has come up and therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be continued as Chairman and Member of the Trust Board till he completes the term of two years. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that having regard to the said claim, the petitioner submitted a representation on 10.07.2015, but so far no orders are passed in the said representation. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner apprehends that the respondent authorities are taking steps to constitute a new Board and in such a case, great prejudice would be caused to him.
