According to the petitioner, her husband purchased property to an extent of 300 square yards in Survey No.35/7, situated at Sriramnagar, Mulagada, with a tiled house vide registered Sale Deed, dated 26.07.1990. After the death of her husband, the petitioner applied for construction of a building by demolishing the existing building in the year 2012 and the building permission was granted on 28.06.2012. In accordance with the permission granted, the building was already constructed. The 3rd respondent is disputing the ownership on the subject property and he filed O.S.No.1303 of 2012, which is pending on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. He sought for a declaration of title and for recovery of possession. While so, at the instance of the 3rd respondent, the impugned notice, dated 03.08.2015, is issued directing the petitioner to submit her explanation as to why the earlier building permission should not be cancelled on the ground that instead of undertaking construction in Survey No.35/7, she has undertaken construction in Survey No.35/19, which is classified as Government land. The notice refers to certain communication between the 3rd respondent and the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation and letter by the Tahsildar. The petitioner submitted explanation on 11.08.2015. Apprehending that the respondents are going to take coercive steps even before the orders are passed, this writ petition is filed.
