The High Court disposed of two joint writ petitions as infructuous. Citing ANDHRA PRADESH PROHIBITION OF RAGGING ACT, 1997 and noting that students had been suspended, the Court held that nothing further survived in the petitions.
Writ petitions disposed of as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.25303 of 2001 and 1326 of 2002
DATED: 18.09.2015
WRIT PETITION No.25303 of 2001
Between: Newspaper Clipping … Petitioner and The SHO, Kurnool PS and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.25303 of 2001 and 1326 of 2002
COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the passage of time, Writ Petition No.1326 of 2002 has rendered infructuous. We have perused the taken up Writ Petition and so also Writ Petition No.1326 of 2002.
Having regard to the prayers in the petitions and considering the provisions contained in Andhra Pradesh Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1997 and so also the fact that students were suspended from the college, in our opinion, nothing further survives in these petitions.
Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
18th SEPTEMBER, 2015.
_____________ S.V. BHATT, J
kvni
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Newspaper Clipping
The SHO, Kurnool PS and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
