A single-paragraph order closing a writ petition because the standing counsel for the petitioners submitted that no further orders are necessary, resulting in the disposal of related miscellaneous petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH &
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W.P.No. 24541 of 2009
DATE: 21.12.2015
Between:
The Vice Chairman and Additional Secretary and four others .. Petitioners
And
G.B. Naidu .. Respondent
O R D E R:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned standing counsel for Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghathan appearing for the petitioners, has submitted that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.
The above submission is placed on record and the writ petition is closed as no further orders are required to be passed.
As a sequel to the closure of the writ petition, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
_________________
G. CHANDRAIAH, J 21.12.2015
______________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
bcj
The Vice Chairman and Additional Secretary and four others
G.B. Naidu
G. CHANDRAIAH
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
