Petitioner counsel submitted the Writ Petition was infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.2298 OF 2009
O R D E R :
Sri Naresh Byarapaneni Reddy, counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and hence, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence.
_______________________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J 20.01.2015 kvrm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.2298 OF 2009
kvrm
DATE: 20.01.2015
Naresh Byarapaneni Reddy
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
