Syed Ali v. M.Raja Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition for Certiorari as infructuous after learning the underlying Tribunal matters were disposed of following the petitioner's retirement from service.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions standing disposed of.
What the court decided
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
&
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W.P. No. 22770 of 2004
DATE: 17.11.2015
Between:
Syed Ali .. Petitioner
and
M. Rajaram and two others .. Respondents
O R D E R:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“……issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the interim order dated 30.11.2004 in O.A.No. 6462 of 2004 on the file of the Hon’ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the same….”
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Syed Ali
- respondent
M. Rajaram and two others
Coram
G. Chandraiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/22770/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The Secrtary to Government, Municipal Administrtion and Vs Sri M.P. Janardhana Rao Town Planning and Building Overseer
The Director of Town and country Planning, a.P., Vs Sri P.N.S.Sai Babu
B. Venkateswarlu, Vs The Prl., Secretarya to Govt., Health Medical and-
V. Johnsundaram, Vs The Municipal Commissioner