Gunisetty Samba Moorthy, S/o. G.Janardhan, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION…
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.22055 of 2015
Dated : 16.07.2015
Between:
Gunisetty Samba Moorthy S/o.G. Janardhan, Aged about 65 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.H.No.8-3-677/C, Flat No.302, Sri Vaikunta Nivas, Navodaya Colony, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad - 73
.. Petitioner
And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 5 others
.. Respondents
This Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.22055 of 2015
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not regularizing the petitioner’s plot No.85 in Sy.No.66/2 of Rayadurg Navkhalsa Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under Layout Regularisation Scheme, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and for a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to regularize the petitioner’s abovementioned plot.
2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent-Municipal Corporation submitted that this writ petition is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in W.P.No.5532 of 2015 dated 10.03.2015.
3. For the reasons alike and following the above said writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 16th July, 2015. Rds
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the action of not regularizing the petitioner's plot is illegal, arbitrary and a violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.5532 of 2015 dated 10.03.2015Followed¶14
Gunisetty Samba Moorthy
State of Telangana
P. Naven Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court