Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the subject matter no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
W.P.No.21883 of 2012
Between:
Dr.Saleem Athar
… Petitioner/Appellant (s)
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others
… Respondent (s)
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 04.08.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
| THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEK |
ER REDDY |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? |
Yes/No |
| 2 | Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reports/Journals |
Yes/No |
| 3 | Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? |
Yes/No |
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.21883 OF 2012
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Any interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J Date: 04.08.2015 dv
Dr.Saleem Athar
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
