The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous pursuant to the counsel's statement that the matter stands closed. The mill/other (the petitioner) achieved desired outcome.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.21518 of 2005
ORDER:
Sri P. Venkateswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the matter may be closed as it has become infructuous.
Sri A. Ravi Babu, learned Standing Counsel for the Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, the successor-in-interest of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation in the State of Telangana, also states so.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
8th October, 2015
IBL
P. Venkateswar Rao and Ors.
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
