The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 21034 of 2005 as infructuous after the respondent counsel stated the petition was no longer active due to the passage of time.
Disposal of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 21034 of 2005
Dt:01.09.2015
Between:
B.Hari Babu.
… Petitioner
And Union of India and another.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 21034 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that with the passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. That seems to be the reason why nobody is coming forward to work it out on merits.
Having regard to the statement made by learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and the prayer made in the writ petition, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Dt:01.09.2015
kdl
B Hari Babu
Union of India
another
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
