Petitioners withdrew their writ petition via letter. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition remained provided; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.20977 of 2014
Date: 17.12.2015
Between :
A.Ravinder s/o. Chinna Mallaiah, Aged 35 years, R/o.H.No.4-85, Mahabubpalli, Kompalli Post, Bhupalapalli (M), Warangal District and another.
…. Petitioners
And
The Telangana GENCO, rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Vidyuthsoudha, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
This Court made the following :
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.20977 of 2014
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners requests leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition and to that effect a letter dated 11.12.2015 is filed into the registry.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 17.12.2015 Kkm
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No.20977 of 2014
Date: 17.12.2015
kkm
A.Ravinder s/o. Chinna Mallaiah and another
The Telangana GENCO rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Vidyuthsoudha, Hyderabad and others
P.Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
