The single-judge High Court allowed the writ petition on the ground that the issue was already covered by a favorable order in W.P. No. 1294 of 2011 dated 11.02.2011.
The writ petition was allowed by allowing the submission that the issue was covered in a prior favorable order. Reasons of the prior order form part of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.20130 of 2012
05.08.2015
Between:
Patan Shafiulla Khan …Petitioner
And
The Divisional Forest Officer, Kurnool
…Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Nagendra Reddy
Counsel for the respondent: Assistant Government Pleader for Forests (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.2501/2009-H3, dated 9.1.2012 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to rule 3(2) of A.P. Saw Mills (Regulation) Rules, 1969 in the interest of justice.”
At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests (AP) fairly conceded that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered in favour of the petitioner by order, dated 11.02.2011, in W.P.No.1294 of 2011.
Considering the aforesaid fair submission, the Writ Petition is allowed following the aforementioned order with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
05th August, 2015
GHN
Patan Shafiulla Khan
The Divisional Forest Officer, Kurnool
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
