A writ petition filed in 2000 concerning a dispute between a market committee and the commissioner was dismissed by this court in 2015. The court held that the matter was committed to memory due to lack of prosecution by the petitioner over many years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WRIT PETITION No. 19645 OF 2000
Between:
Agricultural Market Committee, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
… Petitioner
And
The Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
… Respondent
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 29.07.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the judgment?
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 19645 OF 2000
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner.
Sri Vinod Kumar appears for the respondent.
This petition is pending since October, 2000. On 10.11.2000, the following order on W.P.M.P.No.24899 of 2000 was passed.
“Interim suspension of the endorsement, dated 10.04.2000, of the respondent subject to the petitioner Committee paying a further sum of Rs.5,00,000/- within a period of four (4) weeks from today.”
It is not clear whether the petitioner paid the amount as per the order, dated 10.11.2000. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent is also not in a position to make any statement to that effect. With the passage of time, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting this petition further and hence, nobody is coming forward to work it out. We are therefore constrained to dismiss the writ petition for nonprosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 29.07.2015 ES
Agricultural Market Committee, Kurnool
Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
