Disposed

Enumula Satyanarayana, S/o. Shankaraiah, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Jun 2015WP/16864/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Writ Petition at the admission stage. The petitioner alleged misuse of funds and illegal road construction by the Sarpanch. The Court directed the District Collector to examine the complaints and take appropriate action within six weeks without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direct the District Collector to examine the petitioner's complaints and take appropriate action within six weeks.

Enumula Satyanarayana, S/o. Shankaraiah, Vs The… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.16864 of 2015

¶3

Dated : 15.06.2015

¶4

Between:

¶5

Enumula Satyanarayana S/o.Shankaraiah, Aged 39 yrs, Occu : Upa-Surpanch, Manthini Gram Panchayat, R/o.H.No.15-57/A, Bhagath Nagar, Manthani, Karimnagar District

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 5 others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following :

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.16864 of 2015

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

The petitioner is holding the office of Upa-Sarpanch of Manthini Gram Panchayat of Karimnagar District. The petitioner alleges that the Sarpanch of the Gram panchayat was misusing the funds granted in pursuant to 13^th Financial Commission and also started illegal construction by reducing the width of the road which was originally earmarked from 100 feet, which was reduced to 64 feet, which in the longer course is not conducive to the better management of the traffic. All such decisions by the Sarpanch were taken unilaterally. All her actions amounts to violation of statutory mandate and various orders on the subject. Having noticed such grave illegalities, the petitioner complained to the District Collector,

¶14

Karimnagar on 16.03.2015. He has also submitted another complaint on 23.03.2015. The Revenue Divisional Officer has directed the Divisional Panchayat Officer, Peddapalli, to conduct local enquiry and submit a report. It appears that till now, no such report is filed and no action is taken on the complaints given by the petitioner.

¶15

2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the parties, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, without expressing any opinion on merits, directing the District Collector, Karimnagar (2^nd respondent) to examine the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.03.2015 and 23.03.2015 and take appropriate action as warranted by law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶16

3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶17

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶18

15^th June, 2015

¶19

Rds

Enumula Satyanarayana, S/o. Shankaraiah, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Enumula Satyanarayana, S/o. Shankaraiah, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.a.v.M.Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Musunuri Gangabhavani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mohd. Yakhoob, Vs The State of Telangana.rep by its

T.V. Nanchariah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary

Mohd Amanullah Shareef Vs State of Telalangana

Y. Subramanyam Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh