Modepalli Nagulu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was held infructuous based on counsel's statement and dismissed accordingly.
The writ petition was held infructuous based on counsel's statement and dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.15713 of 2005
ORDER:
Ms. G. Veda Priya, learned counsel representing Mrs. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order
as to costs.
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
12th October, 2015
IBL
Mrs. K. Udaya Sri
unknown
SANJAY KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court