Single judge order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's and counsel's absence on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15431 of 2004
Between:
Sri T. China Venkata Reddy
PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
When the case was called on 06.02.2015 learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be posted today. Even today, when the case is called, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf.
Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J.
13th February, 2015 Js.
Sri T. China Venkata Reddy
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
