Justice G. Chandraiah, holding that the cause of action no longer exists, dismissed W.P. No. 13247 of 2004 as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
&
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W.P.No. 13247 of 2004
DATE: 20.11.2015
Between:
B. Rajesham and another .. Petitioners
And
Y. Rajender and four others .. Respondents
O R D E R:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavili, learned counsel for the petitioners, has submitted that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
The above submission is placed on record and the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
G. CHANDRAIAH, J
20.11.2015
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
bcj
B. Rajesham and another
Y. Rajender and four others
G. Chandraiah
U. Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
