Trident Powers Systems v. A.P. Transco
Case brief
What is this about?
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No:…
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE No: Writ Petition No.12607 of 2002
PROCEEDING SHEET
| S. No. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6. | 24.01.2024 | CJ & JAK, J I.A.No.1 of 2015 (W.P.M.P.No.11288 of 2015) |
|
| Mr. Y.Shreyas Reddy, learned counsel represents M/s Indus Law Firm for the petitioner. Mr. R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-A.P.Transco. This application has been filed by the writ petitioner seeking review of the order dated 11.02.2015 passed in the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of efflux of time, this interlocutory application has been rendered infructuous. In view of aforesaid submission, this interlocutory application is dismissed as infructuous. |
Note: Transferred to (i/o) folder before corrections, if any. B/o lur |
||
| _________ CJ (AAJ) |
|||
| _________ JAK, J LUR |
M/s Indus Law Firm
A.P. Transco
CJ (AAJ)
JAK, J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court