Gutha Sukender Reddy, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous consequent to subsequent events. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also disposed of.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous consequent to subsequent events. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
W.P.No.11992 OF 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed
of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V.BHATT, J
Date: 02.06.2015
Stp/lrkm
Petitioner
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court