A. Bhagawanth Goud, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner was unrepresented on the day of the hearing.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner was unrepresented on the day of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
W.P.No.11201 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last occasion, none appeared for the petitioner. Mr.Venkat Raghu Ramulu, learned Government Pleader appears for the respondents.
Hence, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed
of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V.BHATT, J
Date: 16.06.2015
Stp/Lrkm
Petitioner
Respondents
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S. V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court