Chintala Govindu, v. The Mandal Revenue Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite being called twice on different dates.
The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite being called twice on different dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.11107 of 2005
Between:
Chintala Govindu
PETITIONER
AND
1. The Commissioner of Endowments Government of Andhra Pradesy, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad, and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
When the case was called on 06.02.2015 learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be posted today. Even today, when the case is called, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf.
Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J.
13th February, 2015 Js.
Chintala Govindu
The Commissioner of Endowments, Government of Andhra Pradesh
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court