Disposed
Dr. K. Ravi Naini, D/o. K.V.V. Prasad, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its
Telangana HCWP/10883/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.10883 OF 2015
O R D E R :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lis in the writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 07.01.2015, passed by this Court in WP.No.98 of 2015 and the same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 07.01.2015 passed by this Court in WP.No.98 of 2015, directing the petitioner to submit a representation to the officer who seized the vehicle; the said officer shall within three days from the date of receipt of the representation examine whether the vehicle was used in committing the offence for the first or the second time; and, if so, consider directing release of the vehicle on payment of the prescribed penalty and on execution of a bond by the owner of the vehicle for its production as and when directed by the competent Court to which such seizure was reported by the Officer who seized the vehicle.
The entire exercise, culminating in an order being passed, shall be completed within three days from the date of submission of the representation by the petitioner; and necessary action shall be taken for release of the vehicle, in cases falling within the ambit of Rule 18(i)(a), on payment of the prescribed penalty; and, in other case, on execution of bond being executed in terms of Rule 18(vii) of the Rules. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
16.04.2015
t k.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court