Disposed

M.Khudubuddin, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC10 Apr 2015WP/10289/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, whose father was suspended as a fair price shop dealer due to alleged malpractice in Aadhar seeding while unable to challenge the order before death, sought compassionate appointment. The High Court, noting similar suspension orders were set aside in a related batch, directed the authorities to consider the compassionate appointment application in accordance with court orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of, and the respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment as an F.P.S.D. as per G.O.Ms.No.4 and the common order in WP

M.Khudubuddin, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO

¶2

Writ Petition No.10289 of 2015

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the Government Pleader for the Civil Supplies for the State of Andhra Pradesh.

¶5

2. This writ petition is filed seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3^rd respondent in issuing proceedings dated 27.12.2014 suspending the authorization of the father of the petitioner of the fair price shop No.13 of Ward No.7 of Adoni Town, Kurnool District, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶6

3. The authorisation of the petitioner’s father was suspended by order dated 27.12.20145 by the 3^rd respondent on the ground that he indulged in malpractice of seeding bogus/inactive bogus cards while implementing scheme of Aadhar seeding of ration cards. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the father of the petitioner wanted to challenge the said order, but unfortunately, he died. After his death, the petitioner filed an application before the respondentauthorities to consider his case for appointment as fair price shop dealer on compassionate grounds as per G.O.Ms.No.4 dated 28.02.2014. The said application is pending with the authorities. The apprehension of the petitioner is that as the authorisation of his father was suspended, his name may not be considered for appointment as fair price shop dealer on compassionate grounds in view of the said order of suspension.

¶7

4. This Court in a batch of writ petitions i.e., WP No.1008 of 2015 & batch set aside the suspension orders and allowed the writ petitions on similar grounds.

¶8

5. Under these circumstances, the respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the application filed by the petitioner seeking appointment as fair price shop dealer on compassionate grounds as per G.O.Ms.No.4 dated 28.02.2014 and also as per the common order passed by this Court in WP No.1008 of 2015 & batch.

¶9

6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶10

R. KANTHA RAO, J

¶11

Date: 10.04.2015 Note: CC by 13.04.2015 (BO) BSS

¶12

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO

¶13

¶14

URGENT

¶15

Writ Petition No.10289 of 2015

¶16

Date: 10.04.2015

¶17

BSS

M.Khudubuddin, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Khudubuddin, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Kda spat Limited, Vs The Southern Power Distribution Company

Kadambala Umamaheswari, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

J.Manikyamma Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary

J.Ravinder Reddy, Vs The Chief Secretary

M/s Dilip Re-rolling Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.

M/s. Abishek Re-rolling Mills, Vs The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited