Writ appeal not pressed by appellants against cancellation of land assignment; disposed with liberty to pursue merits-proceedings under specific observation.
Writ appeal disposed as not pressed; antecedent land assignment cancellation proceedings to be decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No.939 of 2015
Dt:04.11.2015
Between:
M.Narasamma and another. … Appellants And
The State of A.P. and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No.939 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Mr.Ganta Rama Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, does not press the writ appeal and seeks observation that if the appeal is filed by the appellants against the order, dated 19.03.2015, whereby the assignment of land, measuring 442 square feet in plot No.2 and 476 square feet in plot No.2, made in favour of appellants 1 and 2 respectively in Survey No.384, situated at Mandagiri Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District is cancelled, the same may be directed to be considered on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection for making such observation.
In view thereof, the writ appeal is disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the appellants to file appropriate proceedings for redressal of their grievance against the order, dated 19.03.2015, impugned in W.P.No.20147 of 2015. It is needless to mention that the concerned authority/forum shall decide the proceedings that will be filed by the appellants against the order, dated 19.03.2015, on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order, dated 10.09.2015 passed in W.P.No.20147 of 2015. All contentions on merits are kept open.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:04.11.2015
kdl
M.Narasamma and another
The State of A.P.
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
