The Acting Chief Justice discharged permission to withdraw Writ Appeals Nos. 890 & 891 of 2015 with liberty to file proceedings before the Wakf Tribunal, ensuring merit disposal uninfluenced by prior observations.
Permission to withdraw writ appeals with liberty to file proceedings before the Wakf Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Writ Appeal Nos. 890 & 891 of 2015
Date:07.10.2015
W.A. No. 890 of 2015 Between: Syed Moinuddin, Janpahad Village, Nereducharla Mandal, Nalgonda District. Appellant And A.P. State Wakf Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Hyderabad and another. … Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Writ Appeal Nos. 890 & 891 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeals with liberty to the appellant to file appropriate proceedings before the Wakf Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995.
The writ appeals are disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
Having regard to the observations made in the impugned order, in particular, the concluding paragraph thereof, it is needless to mention that the Wakf Tribunal shall deal with the application that will be filed by the appellant, on merits, in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
7th October, 2015
Pnb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Syed Moinuddin
A.P. State Wakf Board
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
