In Writ Appeal No.184 of 2015, the High Court of Telangana/Andhra Pradesh dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the order subject to review was outstanding and appellants failed to impugn it.
The writ appeal was dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL No.184 OF 2015
DATED: 06.03.2015
Between: Sri Md. Abdul Maajid and others … Appellants And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL No.184 of 2015
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
Learned counsel for the appellants wants adjournment of this matter.
We are of the view that this appeal is not maintainable as the order against which review application was filed is still remaining outstanding and no steps have been taken by the appellants to impugn the said order.
Hence, we dismiss this writ appeal. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
6th MARCH, 2015.
__________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
kvni
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ appeal challenging a review application is maintainable when the impugned order remains outstanding.
Whether appellants took steps to impugn the outstanding order against which review was filed.
Sri Md. Abdul Maajid and others
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
