This court dismissed the writ appeal as infructuous because the underlying writ petition had already been disposed of by an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APEAL No. 1234 OF 2005
17-12-2015
Between:
The State of Andhra Pradesh, through the Forest Range Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District and another
… Appellants
And
G. Dhanalaxmi
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APEAL No. 1234 OF 2005
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This writ appeal arises from the interim order passed on WPMP No. 31226 of 2004, dated 19-04-2005. We are informed that the writ petition in which the miscellaneous petition was filed itself has been disposed of vide order dated 07-03-2007.
In view thereof, this writ appeal has rendered infructuous and dismissed as such.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J 17-12-2015 ks
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Forest Range Officer, Mancherial
G. Dhanalaxmi
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
