Disposed

Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association Hyd v. Prl Secy Min of Youth Affairms and Sa New Delhi and 3 Others

Telangana HC18 Dec 2015WA/1111/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant withdrew the appeal on merits. This bench directed Respondent No. 4 to consider the appellant's application for affiliation expeditiously within twelve weeks and notified closure of pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 4 directed to consider application on merits within 12 weeks; pending miscellaneous applications closed.

Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association Hyd Vs Prl Secy Min of Youth Affairms and Sa New Delhi and 3 Others — Telangana HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

¶2

Writ Appeal No.1111 of 2015

¶3

Date:18.12.2015

¶4

Between: Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association, Represented by its General Secretary, J.C. Pavan Reddy, Hyderabad.

¶5

Appellant

¶6

And The Union of India, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports Authority, New Delhi and others.

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

¶9

Writ Appeal No.1111 of 2015

¶10

PC:(Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶11

Heard Mr. A. Ushi Redy, learned counsel for the appellant; Mr. B. Narayana Reddy, learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.1; learned Government Pleader for Sports for respondent No.2 and Mr. M.V.S. Prasad, learned counsel for respondent No.3. None appears for respondent No.4.

¶12

Mr. A. Ushi Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal on merits and submits that the appellant would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.4-Indian Olympic Association to consider their application dated 22.4.2015

¶13

(Annexure P-7), whereby, they have applied for affiliation and recognition of the newly elected office bearers of Telangana Olympic Association and Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association (residuary) for a term of four years) i.e., 2015-2019.

¶14

The writ appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

¶15

Respondent No.4 is directed to consider the appellant’s application dated 22.4.2015, on merits, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Appellant is directed to communicate a copy of this order along with copy of writ appeal and its annexures to respondent No.4 within a period of two weeks from today.

¶16

Learned Assistant Solicitor General submits that he shall also

¶17

communicate this order to respondent No.4 requesting them to decide the appellant’s application within the time frame.

¶18

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.

¶19

DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶20

_________________ S.V. BHATT, J 18^th December, 2015

¶21

Note: Furnish C.C. today. b/o Pnb

Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association Hyd v. Prl Secy Min of Youth Affairms and Sa New Delhi and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association Hyd v. Prl Secy Min of Youth Affairms and Sa New Delhi and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kakarla Rajeshwar Rao Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Siddabathula Lakshmi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

The Advocates Bar Association, Narsapur, Medak Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the District

Dr. R. Vijay Kumar S/o R. Samuel, Vs Nrt University of Health Sciences

Kadapa Rajamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Teru Avinash S/o Ramesh, Aged 25 years, Occ Business, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh