Dismissed
Yoh.Abdul Rahman Hydandanr v. a.Narayana Reddy HYDAND14 Ors.
Telangana HCSA/984/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Second Appeal…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Second Appeal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Second Appeal No.984 of 2000
JUDGMENT:
There was no representation for the appellants on 18.06.2015. On that day, the learned senior counsel for the respondents sought time. On 25.06.2015 the learned senior counsel for the respondents reported ready. However, there was no representation for the appellants and hence the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for Dismissal’. Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellants even today. It indicates that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this appeal shall also stand dismissed.
__________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J 07th July,, 2015 Vjl
Appellants
Respondents
M.Seetharama Murti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court