A PIL filed Watch – Voice of the People was not pressed by its counsel due to a subsequent Supreme Court order. The petition was dismissed without merits, with liberty to approach the State Government for relief.
liberty to approach the State Government for appropriate relief
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 483 OF 2013
10-08-2015
Between:
Watch – Voice of the People, a society registered under Societies Registration Act, Regn. No. 286 of 2005, rep., by its President P. Narayana Swami, R/o. H.No. 7-5-14/A, Venkateshwara Colony, Mahabubnagar Town & District
… Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home (Parole) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 483 OF 2013
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23-07-2015 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 48 of 2014, does not press the instant public interest litigation (PIL) and seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Government for appropriate relief.
PIL is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
10-08-2015 ks
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 48 of 2014Referred
Watch – Voice of the People, a society
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
