In PIL No.243 of 2015, the Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution after counsel stated the petitioner had taken away papers and had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.243 of 2015
Dt:07.09.2015
Between:
M.Srinivas Yadav … Petitioner And The State of Telangana and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.243 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.K.Buchi Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has taken away all the papers from him and he has no instructions in the matter.
PIL is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J Dt:07.09.2015
kdl
M.Srinivas Yadav
The State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
