PIL filed before the High Court regarding municipal orders was dismissed as infructuous due to a subsequent modifying government order. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions were disposed of.
PIL dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.194 of 2015
Dt:28.12.2015
Between:
G.R.Karunakar.
… Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 194 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard Mr.Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel holding for Mr.K.S.Murthy, Advocate on record for the petitioner.
Mr.P.Kesava Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation, submits that the impugned G.O.Ms.No.461, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (TC.1) Department, dated 16.07.2009, has been now modified being G.O.Ms.No.168, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (A) Department, dated 20.11.2015, and in view thereof, nothing further survives in the PIL.
PIL is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:28.12.2015
kdl
G.R. Karunakar
The State of Telangana and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
