Disposed
Citizens Forum for Equity and Justice, v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCPIL/157/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 157 OF 2015
Date: 17.08.2015
Between:
Citizens Forum for Equity and Justice, Rep., by its President Gulam Rabbani, Advocate, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 157 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Respondents have filed counter affidavit stating that they have initiated the enquiry and suspended the responsible police personnel in respect of the custody death of one Sri Shaik Hyder in the 3rd respondent-police station.
In view thereof, nothing further survives in the public interest litigation and the same is disposed of. It is open to the petitioner to take appropriate proceedings, if the circumstances so demand.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 17.08.2015 ES
Citizens Forum for Equity and Justice
The State of Telangana
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court