Osman Bin Mohammed Al-Hajri v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE…
SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
PIL No. 152 of 2013
PC: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
This PIL was filed in March, 2013. On 27.02.2015, this Court was informed that respondent No.5 has died during pendency of the petition. On 13.04.2015, the petition was once again adjourned at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. Again, on 15.04.2015, it was adjourned at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner as a last chance. No steps are taken till today for bringing legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.5 on record.
Today, none appears for the petitioner. It appears that with the passage of time, the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this petition further and hence, nobody is coming forward to work out this petition.
Hence, we are constrained to dismiss this PIL for non-prosecution. Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B.BHOSALE,J
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO,J
Dt:20.04.2015
kdl
DILIP B.BHOSALE
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court