The order, under challenge in this CRP, is the order passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka in I.A. No.287 of 2015 in O.S. No.206 of 2010 dated 11.06.2015. Four suits i.e., O.S. Nos.198, 206, 207 and 208 of 2010 were directed to be jointly tried. On closure of the evidence of P.W-1 (plaintiff in O.S. No.206 of 2010), the affidavit-in-chief on behalf of P.W-2 was filed on 13.04.2015, and the matter was posted to 29.04.2015 for cross-examination of P.W-2. On the ground that there was no representation on behalf of the respondent herein, the Court below recorded that there was no cross-examination of P.W-2. Thereafter I.A. No.287 of 2015 was filed to set aside the order passed by the Court below on 29.04.2015, and to permit the respondent to cross-examine P.W-2. The said I.A. was allowed on 01.06.2015, and the matter was posted to 10.06.2015 for cross-examination of P.W-2. The respondent herein filed I.A. No.287 of 2015 requesting the Court below to reject the affidavit-inchief of P.W-2 on the ground that P.W-1 had stated, in his evidence, that he was deposing on behalf of all the plaintiffs. By the order under revision dated 11.06.2015, the Court below allowed the application holding that, if the evidence of P.W-2 was allowed, there was every possibility of repetition of evidence of P.W-1; and more over P.W-1 was estopped by his own admission from introducing P.W-2 as a witness.
