2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that as far as the document pertaining to Schedule-B property is concerned, the document is only a will deed, but not a gift deed, as such, a Will Deed does not require any registration or payment of stamp duty, as such, the said document can be marked in evidence. He also submits that for collateral purpose, the same can be taken into consideration. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that even in respect of Schedule B property, it amounts to conditional gift and same cannot be permitted to be marked in evidence as exhibit, as the same is not registered and stamped. In support of his contention, he relied on the judgment reported in Renikuntla Rajamma (dead) by Legal Representatives v. K.Sarwanamma[1] . He also submits that the document should be read as a whole but not in part. If the document is read in whole, it amounts to gift deed. He further submits that as far as the averment in the first schedule is concerned, it is a gift and that the averment in respect of B schedule is amounts to conditional gift and that the same is required registration under Section17of Stamp Act and Section 35 of the Registration Act. In view of the same, the said document cannot be admitted into evidence. 4. In the instant case, even according to the learned counsel for petitioners, the averment regarding A schedule property is a gift and possession was also delivered. It is clearly stated that the donor has no right except right to enjoy the property during her life time.
