Single-judge order dismissing a civil revision petition seeking to challenge a lower court order refusing to reopen a suit for marking documents. The petition was held liable to fail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1570 of 2015
ORDER:
The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S. No.37 of 2005 and the petitioner in I.A. No.816 of 2014. The petition in I.A. No.816 of 2014 is filed to reopen the case for the purpose of marking two documents. Civil Revision Petition No.1427 of 2015 was filed, under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC, against the order passed in I.A. No.818 of 2014 in O.S.No.37 of 2005 for marking of these two documents. C.R.P.No.1427 of 2015 has been dismissed by the order of this Court dated 17.07.2015. Consequently this Civil Revision Petition filed, against the order passed by the Court below in I.A. No.816 of 2014 dated 13.02.2015 refusing to reopen the suit to have these documents marked, must also fail.
The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No costs.
_______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date: 17.07.2015 MRKR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court should allow the filing of a revision petition challenging an order refusing to reopen the suit for marking documents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
