A single-judge order dismissing a Criminal Revision Petition (No. 1447 of 2015) as infructuous based on the assertion that the cause does not survive for adjudication.
Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
C.R.P.No.1447 OF 2015
O R D E R :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the revision petition does not survive for adjudication and that, therefore, the revision petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions in this revision petition, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
17.11.2015
kvrm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
C.R.P.No.1447 OF 2015
DATE: 17.11.2015
kvrm
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
