Allowed

S. Jayaprakash Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC26 Oct 2015CRLRC/2377/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Revision Case No.2377 of 2015, the Court disposed of an application seeking release of a seized vehicle. The Court directed the release of the vehicle to the petitioner on executing a personal bond with a surety, producing the R.C. book, and undertaking not to alienate the vehicle.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle Regd.No.AP 03 R 8789 released for interim custody subject to personal bond of Rs.1,50,000 with one surety and conditions not to alienate or alter the vehicle.

S. Jayaprakash Reddy, Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2377 OF 2015

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Petitioner/A-2 - owner of the vehicle filed this Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by the order dated 11.09.2015 passed in C.F.No.4931 of 2015 in Crime No.27 of 2015 of K.V.Palle Police Station by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Piler, Chittoor District.

¶4

2. Heard.

¶5

3. Petitioner herein filed the impugned application under Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to release the vehicle i.e., Motor Car bearing Regd.No.AP 03 R 8789 and the said application was returned by the learned Magistrate vide impugned order. Challenging the same, the present revision is filed.

¶6

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and the same is very essential for his daily necessities. Further, if the vehicle is kept idle for a long period, there is every possibility of getting it damaged. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court.

¶7

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that interim custody of the crime vehicle can be granted to the petitioner by imposing certain conditions.

¶8

6. Considering these circumstances, it is directed that vehicle i.e. Motor Car bearing Regd.No.AP 03 R 8789 shall be released for interim custody of the petitioner, subject to final orders to be passed at

¶9

the time of disposal of the main case, on his executing a personal bond for Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Piler, and also on production of original R.C. book. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle, shall not change the physical features of the same till the disposal of the criminal case and further, he shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when required.

¶10

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed.

¶11

_________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶12

26.10.2015 AMD

¶13

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶14

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2377 of 2015

¶15

Date: 26.10.2015

¶16

AMD

S. Jayaprakash Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Jayaprakash Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.A. Waheed Vs State of Telangana

Javvaji Vijaya Laxmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Tirumaladas Krishna Mohan, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Suddala Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

K. Riyaz, Vs The State of A.P.

Veeranna Selvam, Vs State of A.P.