Allowed

Boda Narsing Rao v. Smt. Boda Suvarna

Telangana HC9 Oct 2015CRLRC/2292/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge criminal revision order where Justice Raja Elango directed the petitioner-husband to pay reduced interim maintenance to his wife and daughter, and directed the trial court to dispose of the main case expeditiously without being influenced by this order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay Rs.1,500/month each to respondents 1 & 2 for maintenance and Rs.1,000 legal expenses, plus arrears from petition date.

Boda Narsing Rao Vs Smt. Boda Suvarna — Maintenance and Alimony | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶2

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2292 of 2015

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 19.8.2015 passed in M.P.No.41 of 2015 in M.C.No.79 of 2014 by the Family Court, Secunderabad.

¶5

2. The 1^st respondent, who is the wife of the petitioner, filed the above M.C. on her behalf and on behalf of her daughter against the petitioner, claiming maintenance. During the pendency of the above M.C., the 1^st respondent-wife filed the above M.P. seeking to grant interim maintenance of Rs.18,000/- per month and also legal expenses of Rs.10,000/-. The learned trial Judge allowed the petition in part directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.3,000/- p.m., to each of respondents 1 and 2 from the date of petition and also granting Rs.2,000/- towards legal expenses. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner-husband filed the present revision.

¶6

3. Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶7

4. There is no dispute as to the relationship between the parties. In view of the same and in view of the pendency of the main case, without expression any opinion on the merits of the case, this revision case is disposed of with the following direction:

¶8

I) The petitioner is directed to pay Rs.1,500/- per month to each of respondents 1 and 2 towards interim maintenance on or before 10^th of every succeeding month till disposal of the above M.C. and also to pay Rs.1,000/- towards legal expenses;

¶9

II) The petitioner is directed to pay the arrears of maintenance at the rate fixed by this Court from the date of filing of the petition in M.P.No.41 of 2015, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶10

III) The trial Court is directed to dispose of the above M.C., as expeditiously

¶11

as possible, without being influenced by the above order.

¶12

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶13

JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶14

Dated: 9^th October, 2015

¶15

¶16

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶17

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2292 of 2015

¶18

¶19

09.10.2015

Boda Narsing Rao v. Smt. Boda Suvarna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Boda Narsing Rao v. Smt. Boda Suvarna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jugnu Malpani, Vs M. Padmaja

M.Siddappa Vs The STate of Ap.

Gondlyala Balraj Vs The State of Telangana

Inderpal Hora Vs State of Telangana

Bonagiri Bala Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Kolnati Rama Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh