S. Beesanna Babji Goud, v. The State of A.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused to make further orders in a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 420 IPC. The Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the investigation was completed with a charge sheet. Consequently, the petition was closed along with any miscellaneous petitions pending therein.
What did the court decide?
None; the criminal petition was closed as no further orders were necessary.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.907 of 2015
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A1 in Crime No.71 of 2011 on the file of the Station House Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the Police investigated into the matter and filed the charge sheet. In view of the submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor, no further orders are necessary in this matter.
3. Accordingly, this criminal petition is closed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
December 03, 2015.
YS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
The State
Coram
T. Sunil Chowdary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/907/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court