Dismissed

Gourishetti Leelavathamma v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Telangana HC1 Oct 2015CRLP/8998/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for alleged offences under Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Acts. No worthwhile allegations were found against the elderly petitioner A2. However, liberty was granted to surrender for bail with directed consideration by the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to surrender and seek bail before Magistrate; further remedies left open.

Gourishetti Leelavathamma Vs The State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

¶2

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8998 OF 2015

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A2 and A3 under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the proceedings in crime No.228 of 2015 of Godavarikhani-I Town Police Station, Karimnagar District, which is out come of the report of the 2^nd respondent-de facto complainant registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A I.P.C. and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State before notice to respondent No.2 and before admission. Perused the material on record.

¶6

Though quash petition filed for A2 and A3, it is represented that A1 died a week back and the same is recorded and compelling the quash petition for A2 herein.

¶7

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that even from perusal of the report no worth allegations are made against A2, who was 75 years old woman and unable to move out.

¶8

As the material falls short for this Court to admit the application for quashing of F.I.R. proceedings but for to say the factual matrix entitled to the concession of bail, this application is disposed of giving liberty to the 1^st petitioner/A2 to surrender before the learned Magistrate concerned and move for regular bail with notice to the Additional Public Prosecutor on same day and in such an event the learned Magistrate shall hear and grant bail on the same day with necessary conditions. In the event of police filing final report and cognizance taken by learned Magistrate and summons issued to the petitioner, she can file any special vakalat petition under Section 205 Cr.P.C. before the learned Magistrate to represent through special vakalat holder and the learned Magistrate shall decide the same on own merits. Further remedies are left open to the petitioner.

¶9

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶10

Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶11

Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J

¶12

Date:01-10-2015

¶13

pab

Gourishetti Leelavathamma v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gourishetti Leelavathamma v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sapavat Venkatesh Vs State of Telangana

Bontha Syam Ravi Prakash Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mekala Iyalaiah , S.ilaiah Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Smt.Vimala Rohini Vangala Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Atla Venkata Subba Reddy Vs Mallu Sujitha

Lilli Rani Vs The State of Telangana