Dismissed

Mrs. Jayasudha Gogulamanda v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Oct 2015CRLP/8992/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge disposed of a Section 482 CrPC petition seeking quashment of criminal proceedings. Finding material insufficient for quashment but adequate for bail, the court dismissed the petition granting liberty to surrender and seek regular bail before the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to surrender before the Magistrate and move an application for regular bail.

Mrs. Jayasudha Gogulamanda Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Crl.P.No.8992 of 2015

¶2

ORDER :

¶3

This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, ‘the CrPC’) by the Petitioners/accused to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.17 of 2015 on the file of the Station House Officer, Panjagutta, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of I.P.C. on the report of the respondent Nos.2 to 13complainants.

¶4

2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners so also the learned Public Prosecutor representing State-1^st respondent before admission and before notice to the respondents 2 to 13 and perused the material on record.

¶5

3. It is contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the so called Oversees Placement Services, to which A.1 is shown as Managing Director, is only concerned with providing interaction with the so called employer with the complainants for the prospective employment in the selection process depending upon merit and their role is nothing and so far as the 2^nd petitioner is concerned, he is a professor, husband of said Managing Director(A.1) and so he has no role and when it is a private employment on merit and the respondents 2 to 13 stated in their complaint that they were terminated by the company, there is nothing even from the report showing how the petitioners are privy to the so called alleged cheating, hence it is a fit case for quashing.

¶6

4. As the material, in fact, falls short for this Court to admit the petition to quash petition to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.17 of 2015 supra as it requires the investigation shall go on but the factual matrix entitles for concession of bail to the petitioners.

¶7

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of by giving liberty to

¶8

the petitioners to surrender before the learned Magistrate concerned and move an application for regular bail with a notice to the Public Prosecutor concerned, in such an event, after hearing, the learned Magistrate, to grant bail preferably on the same day with necessary conditions. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.

¶9

____________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J

¶10

Date: 05.10.2015 vvr

Mrs. Jayasudha Gogulamanda v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Jayasudha Gogulamanda v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atla Venkata Subba Reddy Vs Yerasu Vijaya Kumar Reddy

Pitchuka Rupavathi Vs Pitchuka Satya Srinivas

Biyyala Krishnavenamma Vs The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

Ch.Tejokrishna Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Kotakonda Munesh Vs Mullapudi Babu Hari Chandra Prasad

K.Prabhakar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp