Hanumandlu v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
These criminal bail applications were filed by accused Nos. 2 to 13 seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for their anticipated arrest in connection with Crime No. 194 of 2014 registered at Kotagiri Police Station. The judgment text provided ends with the word 'DIRECTION' and a signature draft, but does not contain the specific ruling or operative direction regarding the grant or dismis
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
CRLP .Nos: 45, 46, 47, 48 and 61 of 2015
Crl.P.No. 45 of 2015:
Between: Hanumandlu, S/o. Ramulu,
..... Petitioner/Accused No.12
AND
The State of Telangana, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, through the SHO, Kotagiri PS., Nizamabad District.
.....Respondent/ Complainant
Petition under section 438 of Cr.PC., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/accused No. 12 on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 194 of 2014 on the file of the Kotagiri Police Station, Nizamabad District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relief under section 438 of the Cr.PC.
Whether the High Court should enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in crime No. 194 of 2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hanumandlu
- petitioner
Budde Sayanna
- petitioner
Pappula Sailu
- petitioner
Velagapudi Sethamahalaxmi
- petitioner
Duddukunta Chinnakka
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/45/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court