Disposal of a criminal petition where the court held it was not fit to quash the charge sheet but dispensed with the attendance of accused persons at the trial court except when required.
Dispensaiton of attendance of petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 7 in the underlying trial court except when required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1928 of 2015
ORDER:
Upon hearing both sides, at the admission stage, the following Order is passed:
It is seen that Charge sheet is filed in this case and the case is numbered as C.C.No.456 of 2014 before II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam, Krishna District. Having regard to the stage of the case and in view of the prima facie accusation contained in the Charge sheet, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings. However, considering the request of learned counsel for petitioners, the attendance of petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 7 in C.C.No.456 of 2014 on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, is dispensed with except on the occasions when the trial Court requires their attendance.
With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
24-03-2015 eha.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1928 of 2015
Dt. 24.03.2015
eha
U. Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
