At the admission stage, the Bench held the proceedings were not fit to be quashed and directed the petitioners to approach the trial court for a discharge application on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
Criminal Petition No.1910 of 2015
ORDER:
At the admission stage, the following order is passed.
It is seen that charge sheet is filed and case is registered as C.C.No.105 of 2012. Having regard to the stage of the matter, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings. The petitioners are at liberty to file discharge application before the trial Court, in which case the trial Court shall dispose of the same on merits expeditiously.
On the request of learned counsel for petitioners, the presence of petitioners/A1 to A3 in C.C.No.105 of 2012 on the file of IV Additional JFCM, Nellore is dispensed with except on the occasions when their presence is required by the trial Court.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 23.03.2015 Murthy
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings are fit to be quashed at the admission stage.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
