At the admission stage of Cr.Pet. No.1590 of 2015, the High Court dispensed with the personal appearance of female accused in the trial court unless required by the trial court and then disposed of the petition.
Appearance of female accused in S.C.No.5 of 2015 dispensed with unless trial court requires presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1590 of 2015
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for Petitioners.
At the admission stage, the following Order is passed:
In view of the fact that petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 and 4 are ladies and petitioner/A.2 is aged woman, their appearance in S.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of VII Additional District and Sessions Judge at Medak, is dispensed with except on the occasions when the trial Court requires their presence.
With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
13-03-2015 Note: Issue C.C. by 16.03.2015 eha.
38
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1590 of 2015
Dt. 13.03.2015
eha
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
