3. The petitioners are A1 and A2 and second respondent is de facto complainant in Crime No.816 of 2015. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioners made false representation that they are authorised dealers of Eider Motors and believing such representation the second respondent constructed a show room at Hafeezpet, Hyderabad and deposited amounts towards dealership. It is further alleged that the company was not having RTA approval for sale of vehicles. It is also alleged that the petitioners wilfully and intentionally cheated the second respondent and also threatened him with dire consequences. A perusal of the record reveals that basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioners, the Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad registered a case in Crime No.762 of 2015 against MRCB EIDER MOTORS in which second respondent is one of the partners, for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120B IPC. It is further alleged that there is an agreement between the petitioners and MRCB EIDER MOTORS. Whether the petitioners have committed the alleged offences or not will come to light during the course of investigation.
